Animal Maltreatment: Forensic Mental Health Issues and Evaluations.

Animal maltreatment, typically under the rubric of “animal cruelty,” sometimes enters the psychiatric literature as a manifestation of psychopathology or in relationship to aggression against humans. In this book, animal maltreatment is cast more broadly to include physical abuse, sexual abuse, hoarding, and neglect of animals. Rather than animal abuse or cruelty, deliberate physical abuse is denoted as “intentional animal maltreatment.” The psychiatric literature has examined the conduct of animal abuse and cruelty clinically and diagnostically, as well as its possible association with violent and criminal conduct. Animal Maltreatment covers the subject from a broader perspective and places it within social, historical, and legal contexts, giving meaning and practical approaches to such conduct. In this respect, Animal Maltreatment is a unique and informative contribution to the literature. It can serve as a useful reference and guide to researchers in the field, forensic practitioners in mental health, and policy makers. The editors bring a broad and encompassing perspective to the task, which results in a book with wide application. All have contributed research to the literature. Levitt, who has worked as a correctional psychologist, has conducted research on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Behavioral Unit’s Criminal Histories of Animal Cruelty Offender project. Patronek is a veterinarian and epidemiologist who has directed the Center for Animals and Public Policy and founded the Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium. Grisso is a pioneer in forensic psychology whose research emphasis is on conceptualization and assessment. These authors introduce the reader to the concepts, principles, skills, and research involved in forensic assessments of individuals involved in animal maltreatment. The pioneering book opens the door to the nascent field of forensic animal maltreatment. The book is organized into four sections: Social and Legal Context for Animal Maltreatment presents the historical development of social recognition of animal maltreatment and legislative responses as well as a framework for expanding the relevant knowledge base. Theory and Research on Animal Abuse summarizes the current knowledge base and research on animal cruelty and sexual abuse and examines the link between animal maltreatment and personal aggression and animal neglect and hoarding. Social Responses to Neglect and Hoarding, Cruelty and Sexual Abuse examines how animal maltreatment affects the welfare of animals. Forensic evaluations address conceptualization, methodology, practice, and ethics of forensic examinations of defendants in animal maltreatment cases. The social importance of animal maltreatment goes beyond the well-placed concern over the welfare and suffering of animals. Levitt’s discussion of the psychology and context of various forms of cruelty and sexual abuse is informative. Emily Patterson-Kane, who examines the link between animal maltreatment and personal aggression, observes, “The mere fact that a greater proportion of persons with crimes against people have animal abuse histories does not answer the question [of whether aggression against animals is generalized to people] because it is possible that most people who maltreat animals do not harm humans” (p 141). In reading her update, I am compelled to recall our literature review of childhood cruelty to animals and later aggression against people in which we compared studies that confirmed this association with those that did not. Variations in definitions of animal cruelty, if defined, in personal violence, and in methodologies, helped to explain discrepant results. For future research we recommended direct interview instead of only chart review for data collection, a comprehensive history of animal involvements in childhood, rather than just a few screening questions and defining personal aggression that is “recurrent, dangerous aggression against people” (p 716). From Patterson-Kane’s updated review of literature on the so-called link, it appears that considerable research has been accomplished over the past three decades, but such variations in definitions and methodologies continue to result in an association that is less robust and well characterized than it might oth-